Switching your A/B testing platform isn’t some once-in-a-blue-moon crisis. It’s more like upgrading your phone when the old one starts slowing you down: normal, expected, and necessary as you grow. Maybe your current tool’s pricing skyrocketed. Maybe the UI makes your team want to throw things. Or maybe you’re scaling and need deeper insights.
Planning a CRO platform switch without a plan, is like trying to build IKEA furniture without instructions. Possible? Sure. A disaster waiting to happen? Also yes.
Here’s what you risk if you wing it:
Switching your A/B testing platform doesn’t have to feel like defusing a bomb. Follow this test migration playbook to keep your data safe and your experiments running.
List every running and paused test, their goals, variants, audiences, and durations.
Most platforms allow CSV exports. Download test reports, user segments, conversion metrics, and experiment notes.
Write down how your old platform defined conversions, bounce rates, significance, and any other KPI—it’ll matter later.
Don’t switch mid-Q4 or during product launches. Choose a low-traffic period to minimize disruption.
Before canceling the old one, implement your new A/B testing platform on staging or as a second script on live pages.
Start with high-traffic, high-impact experiments. Recreate them manually using the documentation from Step 1.
For 1–2 tests, run them simultaneously on both platforms to spot discrepancies and validate the setup.
Once you're confident, remove the old platform’s script, switch over entirely, and start fresh tests in the new system.
During a CRO platform switch, connecting past insights to current experiments keeps your strategy on track. Here's how to carry that legacy forward with your new A/B testing platform:
You’ve survived the test migration. High five! Now let’s check if everything’s actually working. This A/B testing platform checklist will help you catch issues early.
✅ Script placement verified: Is the new tool's script correctly placed on all relevant pages?
✅ Goals tracking properly: Are test goals firing correctly in your analytics dashboard?
✅ Audience segmentation live: Are user segments working as intended?
✅ Baseline test run completed: Did you run a basic test to confirm everything’s tracking?
✅ CRM & analytics integration tested: Are you syncing data with HubSpot, Segment, or Google Analytics?
✅ User permissions updated: Does everyone on your team have access and know how to use the new platform?
✅ Old platform fully deactivated: Double scripts can skew test data—clean up old code ASAP.
Switching to a new A/B testing platform isn’t something to fear—it’s a smart move when your current tool starts slowing you down. But without a clear test migration plan, you risk losing valuable insights, test continuity, and momentum.
By auditing your setup, migrating intentionally, and checking your data every step of the way, you’ll pull off a smooth transition—and set your team up for better experimentation in the long run.
What’s the safest way to switch CRO platforms without data loss?
The safest way to migrate is to start by exporting all historical data and documenting current experiments in detail: goals, variants, audiences, and metrics. Set up the new platform in parallel without turning off the old one right away. Rebuild your highest-impact tests manually, and validate everything with a few test runs before making a full switch
How long does it take to migrate to a new A/B testing tool?
The timeline depends on how many tests you're running and the complexity of your setup. On average, expect 1–3 weeks to complete a clean migration. This includes setup, documentation, validation, and switching off the old platform. If you’re mapping legacy data or syncing integrations, it could take slightly longer.
Do I need to pause live tests before migrating platforms?
Not necessarily. You can keep live tests running while onboarding the new tool—just avoid launching major new tests until tracking is fully validated. For sensitive or high-traffic experiments, consider pausing them briefly during the cutover to avoid data conflicts or skewed results.
